Physicians
Continue to Disagree About Vaginal Delivery and Herpes
Family
Practice News, February 15, 1995, page 29
Vaginal
Delivery During Recurrent Herpes: Experts Agree to Disagree
SAN FRANCISCO -- Try as they
might, physicians attending a workshop at the annual meeting of the
International Herpes Management Forum could not agree to recommend vaginal
delivery in pregnant women with a lesion from recurrent genital herpes.
Some European members clearly
were disappointed that they could not persuade their American colleagues
to drop an emphasis on cesarean section delivery in these cases.
Instead, the workshop group
agreed that The potential risks of both modes of delivery should be
discussed with the mother to be (preferably well before delivery) and
informed consent obtained for the chosen method. If vaginal delivery
is selected, avoid the use of instruments such as forceps or fetal scalp
monitors whenever possible.
About 1 in 10 women with
recurrent herpes will have a lesion at delivery.
"I'm very disappointed,"
said Dr. Willem van der Meijden, a gynecologist in the department of
dermatology and venereology at University Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
"The rate of cesarean
sections has gone down dramatically in the Netherlands, and there is
not a single extra case of neonatal herpes. That was reached primarily
by telling obstetricians not to operate on women with a history of genital
herpes:' he said.
Dr. Babill Stray-Pedersen,
professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Oslo, said
that only 8% of babies in the Netherlands are delivered by cesarean
section, compared with 13% in Norway and 22% in the United States. In
the United States, maternal mortality is three to four limes higher
with cesarean section than with vaginal delivery, and cesarean section
generates 20 times as much morbidity.
Primary herpes simplex virus
type 2 infection in the mother carries a 50% chance of infecting the
baby, but with recurrent herpes the rate of neonatal infection is 1-3%.
"As far as we know now, whether you have a lesion or not, the transmission
rate is the same" in recurrent herpes, she said.
Dr. Stray-Pedersen cited
one study that calculated one maternal death for every 1.75 cases of
neonatal herpes prevented under a policy of cesarean sections when recurrent
lesions are present. Approximately 1,580 "excess" cesarean
sections would be needed to prevent one case of neonatal herpes (JAMA
270:77- 82,1993).
An Israeli physician complained
that much of the medical world follows the lead of the United States.
"To change the practice in my country, we must try to change the
practice in the U.S.," he said.
Dr. Larry Corley, head of
the virology division at the University of Washington School of Medicine,
Seattle, said cesarean sections in the presence of recurrent lesions
are a sore subject for some U.S. physicians as well.
"You can't manage it
rationally in the United States" because of the threat of lawsuits,
he said. "That C-section may not be warranted [in these cases]
is probably correct," he added, but he still recommends avoiding
vaginal delivery in these women.
The only way to change the
practice in this country may be to give suppressive antiviral therapy
to women with a history of herpes simplex virus disease in order to
prevent lesions at delivery and avoid a cesarean section. "You
may treat hundreds who don't need it, but it still may be cheaper than
a C-section:' he suggested.
The lack of data on the protective
effects of cesarean section vs. vaginal delivery left most of the group
reluctant to recommend either one. Dr. van dei Meijden suggested establishing
"Mode of Delivery Registry" for women with recurrent genital
herpes during labor, so that institutions with different approaches
could compare outcomes.
Until there are substantive
data, he said, "it is clear that much is not clear"
All agreed that vaginal delivery
is appropriate in women with recurrent herpes but no lesion at the time
of delivery. They suggested culturing to detect the presence or absence
of asymptomatic viral shedding, mainly in the hopes that a negative
result will relieve some of the worry for parents sent home with instructions
to be alert for herpes symptoms in their child.
The group also recommended
marking the mother's and baby's charts--in code, if it's a sensitive
subject--to indicate the presence of maternal herpes. Women should be
examined at the time of birth and asked to point to any affected area
if they think they are having a recurrence. Cultures should be taken
from a woman with symptoms irrespective of the presence or absence of
a lesion.
[CDC- Primary herpes infection
in the mother has a 50% chance of infecting the baby.]
~
top of page ~